Fat Rabbit kicked off Push Gaming's genuine four-game "Fat" series, each one built around a mascot that literally grows as it eats its way through a themed collectible. If you're after slots like Fat Rabbit, we compare all four honestly, and clear up a common mix-up with an entirely unrelated Pragmatic Play title along the way.
Where to Play Fat Rabbit Slots
The complete Fat Rabbit lineup: four games at a glance
All four genuine Push Gaming entries — figures checked 6 July 2026:
| Game | Year | Layout | RTP | Max win |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat Rabbit | 2018 | 5x5, 50 paylines | 96.45% | 10,223x (disputed, see below) |
| Fat Santa | 2018 | 5x5, 50 paylines | 96.45% | 6,405x |
| Fat Drac | 2021 | 5x5, 40 win lines | 96.57% | 50,000x |
| Fat Banker | 2022 | 5 reels (6 during Fortune Link) | 96.43% | 25,000x |
Fat Rabbit's own max win is disputed — 10,223x is the figure most widely cited by aggregators, while BigWinBoard's own tested/theoretical figure is 3,844x; both are shown rather than one being silently picked. Fat Rabbit's volatility is also disputed between High (Push Gaming/BigWinBoard) and Low-to-Medium (other aggregators).
Every game, reviewed
1. Fat Rabbit (2018)
The original runs a 5-reel, 5-row grid with 50 fixed paylines on a cartoon farm theme. Its whole identity is the rabbit mascot itself: an expanding wild that grows from 1x1 up to a full 5x5 by "eating" Wild Carrot symbols during free spins, which trigger when the rabbit and a wild carrot land together and start at 5 spins. A separate random base-game "Harvest Feature" sends a tractor across the reels dropping extra Wild Carrots outside the bonus round entirely. Published at 96.45% RTP, with disputed volatility (High per Push Gaming and BigWinBoard, Low-to-Medium per other aggregators) and a max win reported as either 10,223x or 3,844x depending on the source.
2. Fat Santa (2018)
Released the same year as the original, Fat Santa keeps the identical 5x5, 50-payline layout but swaps the farm for a North Pole setting. Santa himself is the expanding-wild mascot, growing as he collects Christmas Pie symbols in the same free-spins structure as the original. Published at 96.45% RTP with a 94.15% reduced tier, and a max win of 6,405x — a figure independently corroborated across multiple aggregators, more credible than an apparent scraping artifact on one official-page fetch that simply duplicated Fat Rabbit's own number.
3. Fat Drac (2021)
Released 14 October 2021, per Push Gaming's own announcement calling it "the third in our Fat Series," Fat Drac trades the countryside and North Pole for a gothic vampire's castle across a 5x5 grid and 40 win lines. The mechanic gets genuinely more elaborate here: Fat Drac himself acts as a scatter/reveal symbol, free games trigger when he lands alongside Goblet symbols, a "Fat Bat" feature collects Instant Prize Bubbles worth up to 50,000x during the base game, and a Coffin symbol triggers its own pick-features. Published at 96.57% RTP with a 94.05% reduced tier, High volatility, and a confirmed 50,000x max win — a genuine leap over the first two games.
4. Fat Banker (2022)
The newest entry swaps the earlier themes for a 1920s Art Deco banker, his wife and their dog, running 5 reels in the base game that expand to 6 during a "Fortune Link" respin feature. The banker mascot grows by collecting Wild Money-Bag symbols, the same expanding-wild lineage as the rest of the family, layered here with Fortune Link respins collecting Bullion and Multiplier symbols alongside Red Car/Gold Car reel-modifier features. Published at 96.43% RTP with a 94.45% reduced tier, High volatility, and a 25,000x max win.
Slots like Fat Rabbit that aren't: the Fat Panda mix-up
"Fat Panda" sometimes gets assumed to be part of this series purely because of the shared naming pattern, but it's an entirely unrelated Pragmatic Play title — a different studio, different mechanic, and no connection to Push Gaming's expanding-mascot family at all. If you were looking for a panda-themed entry in this series, it doesn't exist; Push Gaming's own catalogue lists exactly four Fat-branded games, and Fat Panda isn't one of them.
Fat Rabbit: quick facts
| Provider | Push Gaming |
|---|---|
| First released | 27 March 2018 |
| Layout | 5 reels × 5 rows, 50 fixed paylines |
| RTP | 96.45% (reduced tiers 95.28%/90.51%) |
| Volatility | Disputed — High (Push Gaming/BigWinBoard) or Low-Medium (other aggregators) |
| Max win | 10,223x per most aggregators (3,844x per BigWinBoard's own tested figure) |
| Signature feature | The rabbit grows from 1x1 to 5x5 by eating Wild Carrot symbols in free spins |
✓ Facts checked 6 July 2026
The maths: rising RTP, rising ceiling
What a hundred £1 spins costs at each game's confirmed published RTP:
| Game | House edge | £1 × 100 spins |
|---|---|---|
| Fat Rabbit (96.45%) | 3.55% | £3.55 |
| Fat Drac (96.57%) | 3.43% | £3.43 |
✓ Calculated from the published RTPs — checked 6 July 2026
Unusually for a growing franchise, Fat Drac manages to combine the family's best RTP with its highest max win at the same time — a genuine improvement on both fronts rather than a straight trade-off. Session tools on our Responsible Gambling page.
History and legacy
Push Gaming's own announcement for Fat Drac explicitly frames it as "the third in our Fat Series, following Fat Rabbit and Fat Santa" — confirmation that the studio always intended this as a deliberate, ongoing family rather than a one-off hit getting reskinned after the fact, the same deliberate approach behind the studio's other big earner, Razor Shark. The core expanding-mascot mechanic barely changed between the first two games, then got genuinely more elaborate with Fat Drac's Instant Prize Bubbles and Fat Banker's Fortune Link respins, tracking a real max-win climb from roughly 10,000x to 50,000x across four years.
Why this family still matters
Few "expanding wild" mechanics have survived four sequels without either getting abandoned or diluted into a generic feature; the fact that Fat Banker still leads with the same eat-to-grow mascot idea as the 2018 original says something about how well the format has held up.
Beyond the reels
Push Gaming Holding Plc holds an active UK Gambling Commission licence covering Gambling Software, Game Host (Casino) and Gaming Machine Technical Software, confirmed via the public register. All four Fat-series games are widely distributed across UK-facing operators carrying the Push Gaming catalogue, the same catalogue that carries the studio's cluster-pays hit Jammin' Jars.
What players say
Players who want the purest version of the eat-to-grow mechanic tend to favour the original Fat Rabbit, while Fat Drac draws the most attention from players chasing a genuinely bigger ceiling with its Instant Prize Bubbles feature. Fat Banker's Fortune Link respins appeal specifically to fans of collect-and-multiply mechanics rather than the simpler expanding-wild format of the earlier three.
Big wins: none we could verify
We found one promising-looking lead — an AboutSlots page crediting a CasinoDaddy win by a streamer named "Masse" on Fat Rabbit, dated 7 December 2022 — but on actually opening the page it turned out to be an empty, broken catalogue entry with no multiplier, cash figure, bet size or casino platform stated at all. Beyond that, only vague YouTube clip titles exist with no dedicated write-up behind them. Rather than repeat an unverified figure, we're reporting plainly that no documented big win could be confirmed for any game in this franchise.
Picking the best Fat-series slot to play first
| If you want… | Play | Why |
|---|---|---|
| The original, purest expanding-mascot format | Fat Rabbit | The game that started the eat-to-grow mechanic |
| A festive reskin of the same idea | Fat Santa | Identical layout, Christmas Pie collectibles instead of carrots |
| The biggest confirmed ceiling | Fat Drac | 50,000x max win and the best RTP in the family |
| A collect-and-multiply respin twist | Fat Banker | Fortune Link respins on top of the expanding-wild core |
Our verdict on Fat Rabbit
Sister Slots score: 7/10 — a genuinely consistent expanding-mascot format that kept finding new ways to build on its own idea across four sequels.
| Features | 7/10 — the eat-to-grow mascot mechanic stays recognisable while genuinely expanding with each entry |
|---|---|
| Win potential | 7/10 — a confirmed climb from roughly 10,000x to 50,000x across the family |
| Design | 8/10 — four distinct, well-realised themes sharing one consistent visual language |
| Playability | 7/10 — Fat Drac and Fat Banker's added mechanics give the later games more variety than the simpler original pair |
Play here if you like a slot mascot that visibly grows as you play rather than a static wild symbol. Look elsewhere if you were actually after Fat Panda — that's an unrelated Pragmatic Play title you won't find in our slot series index.
Fat Rabbit FAQs
Who makes Fat Rabbit?
Push Gaming, which holds an active UK Gambling Commission licence.
How many Fat-series games are there?
Four: Fat Rabbit (2018), Fat Santa (2018), Fat Drac (2021) and Fat Banker (2022).
Is Fat Panda part of this series?
No — that's a separate, unrelated Pragmatic Play slot with no connection to Push Gaming's Fat series.
What is the expanding-mascot mechanic?
Each game's mascot grows larger as it collects a themed symbol during free spins, unlocking bigger wins at larger sizes.
Which game has the biggest max win?
Fat Drac, at a confirmed 50,000x.
Can you confirm any big wins on Fat Rabbit or its sequels?
Not with confidence. The one lead that looked promising turned out to be an empty catalogue entry with no real figures attached, and nothing else checked out either.
Are these slots fair?
Yes — Push Gaming holds an active UK Gambling Commission licence with independently tested RNGs.
Sources & Verification
Primary sources checked 9 July 2026: Push Gaming’s own corporate site; and the UK Gambling Commission’s public register (Push Gaming Holding Plc, account 54984).
Paul edits Sister Slots’ UK slot-family guides. He researches provider histories, mechanics and published game data, checking material claims against provider sources and relevant public records. Unless a page states a dated hands-on method, it reflects documented editorial research rather than real-money play. More about Paul →